Newark
A castle was supposedly built at Newark for Bishop Alexander of
Lincoln (1123-48) before 1135. The evidence that Alexander built
the castle comes from Henry Huntingdon's comment on the seizing of the
fortress by King Stephen
(1135-54) in 1139. This has been taken to mean that there was
nothing at the site other than spring flowers before the castle was
built.
The king took Bishop Alexander, who he had imprisoned at Oxford,
to Newark. There the bishop had built above the River Trent,
composed in a flowery springtime place, an ornate castle. (Ibi quidem construxerat episcopus super flumen Trente in loco amoenissimo vernantissimum florida compositione castellum.)
When he arrived there the king ordered, against the law, the bishop to
be starved, affirming with an oath that he should go without all food
until he surrendered the castle to him.
Quite clearly Henry attributes the building of a castle at Newark to
the bishop. However, better evidence, in the form of
archaeological excavations last century, have turned up tenth century
Saxon pottery and a timber palisade later utilised by the
‘Norman' castle. It also found Bronze Age pottery and
possible Roman ditches. Quite clearly the site had been in
occupation since the earliest days of civilization. The
excavators' conclusions included the fact that the castle and borough
defences had probably been laid out soon after the Norman Conquest,
although the castle site and centre of the present borough were
apparently defended before this date. Quite possibly the first
fortifications dated back to the early tenth century when King Edward
(899-924) attempted to secure control of the River Trent from Lincoln
to Nottingham. Certainly the gatehouse
foundations are built right on top of the earlier Saxon cemetery and
Newark has been argued to mean New Work, a term used for the place as early as 1057.
Despite speculation, the known history of the castle site only really begins with a notification of Henry I
dated to July 1133. This granted Bishop Alexander permission to
build a bridge over the River Trent at his castle of Newark as long as
this did not damage the royal boroughs of Nottingham or Lincoln.
All this actually shows is that the castle predated the bridge and that
it belonged to Bishop Alexander. Consequently the castle building
date of c.1133 that is often banded around can be seen to be quite
meaningless. Also the idea that Henry's notification, probably of
1130, which gives Bishop Alexander permission to divert the royal
highway ‘which used to pass through Newark' to make a causeway
for his fishpond' appear to have nothing to do with
fortifications. This was probably linked to the September 1129
fine accounted for by the bishop's steward for their making a causeway
in the highroad by trespass. Another notification probably of
July 1133 allowed Bishop Alexander to have a 5 day fair ‘at his
castle of Newark' on St Mary Magdalen's day and the 4 days previous,
viz 18-22 July. Quite obviously the castle was a going concern at
this time and not a new build.
With this lack of evidence for castle building comes one original
source that does show that the bishop was modifying his fortifications
at Newark. At some point between 1123 and 1133 King Henry
notified his lieges that he had allowed Alexander ‘the entire
third of the service of his knights belonging to the bishopric of
Lincoln so that he may assign them to his castle of Newark and that
thenceforward they may keep guard there and do the other services which
they ow to the bishop as he has disposed. Quite plainly such an
operation could well be connected with the upgrading of Newark castle
by the bishop.
After 1139 King Stephen returned
Newark castle to the bishops of Lincoln and, in the last year or so of
his reign, granted them the right to mint coins at their vill of
Newark. This boon was soon rescinded as England returned to a
state of law and order after Stephen's death in October 1154. In
1167 King Henry II (1154-89)
seized the castle on the death of Alexander's successor, Bishop Robert
Chesney of Lincoln. In 1173 the king granted the bishopric to his
natural son, Geoffrey, who held the castle for some time, apparently
entertaining his father there in 1180. The next year Geoffrey
surrendered Newark to the king, who retained possession until 1186 when
the castle was given to the new bishop of Lincoln, St Hugh
(d.1200). King John
(1199-1216) visited the castle in 1205 and between 1207 and 1213 there
was no bishop of Lincoln due to the Interdict. This meant the
castle remained in the king's hands.
In 1215 King John visited Newark
and ordered brattices to be made for the castle and handed it over to
Philip Mark. During the summer of 1216 John ordered Philip to
return the castle to Bishop Hugh Wells (d.1235), but Hugh refused
causing John to grant it instead to Robert Gaugy. Less than 2
months later, the king, having crossed the Wash, died here of dysentery
on 18 October 1216 after having lain for 3 days within the
fortress. With the cessation of the civil war the castle was
restored to Bishop Hugh (d.1235) in 1218 after a week long siege using
stone throwing engines and pickmen. Even then the castle was
surrendered on the terms of Robert receiving £100 for his costs
in holding the castle.
There is a possibility that the castle was being upgraded in 1284 when
an inquest found that Walter Newport, mason in Newark castle, fell from
a certain beam in a turret and forthwith died'.
Edward II seized the castle from
Bishop Henry Burghersh in 1322 and gave it to his friend, Earl Donald
of Mar, the rebel nephew of King Robert Bruce (d.1329). In 1323
Donald was ordered by Edward to guard the prisoners in the castle
carefully. In 1325 the earl was allowed that year's rent for the
fortress as he had repaired the castle at his own cost. The
castle was then returned to the bishop. The new windows and
refurbishments of the main suite was effected between 1471 and 1480
under Bishop Rotherham as his coat of arms is displayed under the oriel
window. The castle was surrendered by Bishop Holbeach to Henry
VIII in 1547.
The gatehouse, hall, middle and south-west towers were altered and
refenestrated for the earl of Rutland in 1581. As a royal castle
Newark was held for Charles I during the Civil War and besieged in 1644
and 1646, the king finally surrendering to the Scots there ending the
first Civil War. Eighty-five years later it lay a slighted and
roofless ruin, although restoration work was carried out by Anthony
Salvin between 1845 and 1848.
Description
The original castle was an irregular rhomboid shape about 250' by 180',
stretching along the marshy ground along the River Trent. above a
crossing point. It has further been suggested that the odd shape
of the north-eastern corner was due to the fact that this was where William I (1066-87) constructed a great motte. As royal Conquest mottes tended to be very large, but several known ones, like Hereford and Worcester,
have disappeared, this is not impossible. Certainly the rest of
the clay ramparts of the original Conquest castle were largely thrown
down when the current stone castle was constructed on its packed
remains. Surviving from this original castle are the remnants of
a cobbled courtyard to the south of the ward and the revetted rampart
under the south-west tower on the southern front of the curtain.
The interior ground level has been raised some 5' in the eighteenth
century so that the interior is now at first floor level of the
south-west tower.
As the ground dipped to north and south, the river was to the west and
the town on slightly lower ground to the east, the site made a natural
defensive position. Excavation suggests that the whole area of
the castle was heavily occupied from the earliest days, although mainly
ditches remain of their features due to Victorian clearances of the
upper stratigraphical layers of the site, although the remains of 2
Saxon buildings were found which had been demolished and then buried
when the castle rampart was constructed.
Of the original early twelfth century castle only the great gatehouse
and the rectangular south-west tower survive, together with some
fragments of the curtain wall. The bulk of the other surviving
ruins, the polygonal north and middle towers with intervening curtain
above the river, would seem to be late thirteenth or early fourteenth
century extension. All the main living accommodation, hall,
solar, chapel etc were along the west wall over the river in this
latter castle and possibly in the twelfth century predecessor.
The hall undercroft behind the middle tower would appear to be mid
fourteenth century, while the river front oriel window seems to have
been added for Bishop Thomas Rotherham (1471-1480).
Gatehouse
The gatehouse is the pride and joy of Newark castle. This
rectangular tower stands 3 storeys high and has an ashlar front with 2
corner pilaster buttresses to the north face. The original tower
has had a further exterior extension added to it. The interior
tower is approximately 35' square and is internal to the main
curtain. This has a slightly later subsidiary chamber jutting out
from it 33' wide, but only 15' in depth. This gives the gatehouse
a 15' extension to the gate passageway which lacks any portcullis or
apparently a drawbridge, although there was a drawbridge pit in front
of it judging by the late Victorian photographs of the site. It
has been suggested by the excavators that this moat before the
gatehouse was the fishpond mentioned by Henry I
(1100-35). This may explain the lack of defences to the
gatetower, it apparently only having the one gate for its entire
defence. As an ecclesiastical castle Newark bears some
similarities to the Romanesque Rochester keep as well as Sherborne and Wolvesey castles.
The
gatetower's original ashlar front has been much altered with low, but
powerful Victorian buttresses being added on either side, presumably to
halt the cracking which is noticeable heading upwards from either side
of the main gate. The rear ashlar to the tower has been stripped
off, no doubt as it was more accessible. Three twin sixteenth
century windows have been added above and the ashlar repaired or
replaced with the bulk of a projecting string course being
destroyed. This can be confirmed by the remnants of triple
Romanesque window embrasures remaining within the tower extension at
first floor level. This forward chamber may have been the
constable's private chamber with a view of the entrance bridge and
probable outer ward to the north. A doorway led south into the
main chamber which was reached via the stair turret vice. A
second exit from the ‘private' chamber now leads to mid air over
the moat, although originally there would appear to have been some sort
of wooden gangway leading back to a smaller doorway within the curtain
wall. As the private chamber is an addition to the gatetower it
is to be presumed that this wooden walkway was added as it was
otherwise impossible to reach the chambers within the curtain at this
level. As no other means of access to this chamber is apparent,
it would appear that this was an early change to the tower plan,
possibly caused by a planning mistake. Within this part of the
curtain was a private garderobe and beyond that a barrel vaulted square
chamber with a light to the west. This was probably the
constable's bedroom set in a small turret, apparently the mirror image
of the stair turret to the east. Possibly the doorway between the
constable's chamber and the private room was originally a window to
allow a view of the bridge. Certainly the private room could not
have been a chapel, being equipped with a garderobe, bedroom and in the
western wall a now blocked fireplace. All in all this layout
suggests an early design.
The main gatetower chamber was originally 2 storeys high, while the
‘private' chamber had a lean to roof facing north, of which
traces of its crease still remain in the side walls. At some
point the roof of this chamber was raised and it was converted into 2
storeys, as was the main chamber behind. Access to these new
rooms was achieved by cutting doorways from the vice. Also at
this level was another original chamber set in the west turret, but
including most of the space above the passageway to the latrine of the
constable's possible bedroom below. This room was only accessed
via a corridor in the west curtain which itself was reached via a vice
set in the corner of the original castle wall which came up just west
of the constable's garderobe below. Quite likely this isolated
room was the bishop's treasury. This was a somewhat similar
layout to the gatetower at Ludlow.
Behind the ashlar the masonry of the rest of the tower consists of poor
slabs of mudstone, although the surviving original fenestration, like
the tall Romanesque arch of 2 external orders to the west, but 4 orders
to the interior, is made of the same limestone as the ashlar
front. In the interior part of the tower was a large, fine
Romanesque window of 3 orders to the east, which has since been
blocked. An impressive stair turret with large vice was behind
the curtain junction to the east. Towards its summit Romanesque
doorways to east and west led to the curtain wallwalk and gatehouse
roof respectively. Above the possible treasury was another
similar chamber, also reached via the same stairway. This has
mostly been destroyed, but there are the remains of a light cut at 40
degrees through the north corner of the inner gatetower. That it
is at this angle suggests that this was a modification to the original
plan and that it was half blocked when the outer tower was added to the
design suggests another change in plan. The east stair turret
continued on for another storey, no doubt as a watchtower.
Flanking
the gatehouse are 2 original sections of curtain wall some 60'
high. That to the west is the most interesting. This runs
some 35' towards the river where it ends in a quoined corner which has
been built onto by the later curtain which runs on to the north
tower. Within the old curtain are suites of garderobes accessed
from the gatetower and indicating, as if its ornate fenestration hadn't
already, that this included chambers of great sophistication.
Timber reinforcement found within the gatehouse and curtains showed
that they were constructed as one. Excavation showed that the
curtain at least was set on a few rows of poor quality herringbone
masonry on the rock hard clay rampart remains of the earlier
castle. Towards the north end of the west curtain there may also
have been a watergate, replaced by the later one which still
exits. A barrel vaulted passage was found under the current
undercroft during excavations. This still retained mortar similar
to that found in the gatehouse.
The other surviving part of the original castles is the rectangular
south-west tower. This too is of 3 stages, but has a later
battered plinth. The inner side has a reconstructed roll-moulded
Romanesque doorway with shafts. In the undercroft are the remains
of a doorway to the early chapel. Garderobes of various ages
frequently grace the site as do a total of at least 5 bottle and normal
prisons spread around the castle.
Copyright©2021
Paul Martin Remfry